Executive Overview

Major League Baseball (MLB) is approaching a critical juncture in its structural and economic history. For the first time since the admission of the Arizona Diamondbacks and Tampa Bay Devil Rays in 1998, the league is actively laying the groundwork for physical expansion. Commissioner Rob Manfred has publicly established a strategic mandate to expand the league from its current 30 franchises to 32 before his anticipated retirement in January 2029. This expansion is not merely an exercise in growing the sport’s footprint; it is an overarching logistical and financial optimization strategy designed to ease the gruelling travel demands of a 162-game schedule, streamline playoff broadcasting windows, and capitalize on a highly lucrative expansion fee projected to exceed $2.2 billion per incoming market.

Within this highly competitive bidding landscape, the city of Montreal has re-emerged as a complex and polarizing candidate. As North America’s largest metropolitan market without an MLB franchise, Montreal offers undeniable demographic scale, corporate density, and a deeply entrenched, albeit historically scarred, baseball culture. However, the systemic vulnerabilities that precipitated the relocation of the Montreal Expos to Washington, D.C., following the 2004 season—namely, severe currency exchange volatility, catastrophic stadium infrastructure failures, and intense political resistance to public sports subsidies—remain highly relevant.

This comprehensive report evaluates the viability of the Montreal expansion bid by synthesizing modern sports economics, urban real estate development paradigms, Canadian broadcasting oligopolies, and socio-political dynamics. By dissecting past failures and analyzing the macroeconomic hedges embedded in modern collective bargaining agreements, this analysis determines the precise, and remarkably narrow, conditions under which Major League Baseball could successfully return to Quebec.

The Strategic Architecture of MLB Expansion (2026-2029)

The Logistics of a 32-Team Paradigm and Geographic Realignment

The current structure of Major League Baseball, featuring two leagues of 15 teams divided into six divisions of five, creates persistent logistical friction. The odd number of teams in each league requires continuous interleague play, which complicates scheduling rest days across a demanding 162-game season played over just 186 days. Commissioner Manfred has explicitly stated that expanding to 32 teams is a mathematical optimization that allows for symmetrical division structures.

Adding two franchises would enable a radical geographic realignment. Rather than maintaining the traditional, structurally rigid American and National Leagues, MLB could transition to a geographically optimized Eastern and Western conference model. This realignment could take the form of either eight divisions of four teams (mirroring the National Football League) or four divisions of eight teams (similar to the National Hockey League). Such a geographic consolidation would drastically reduce the physical wear and tear on athletes by cutting inter-regional travel, a primary concern for the Major League Baseball Players Association (MLBPA).

Furthermore, this realignment presents significant media benefits. Commissioner Manfred has noted that the current playoff format often creates logistical challenges for broadcast partners like ESPN and Apple TV, such as forcing East Coast teams into late-night Pacific time slots. A strict geographic split would isolate playoff scheduling into optimized regional broadcasting windows. The league is expected to maintain intra-city rivalries by keeping legacy dual-market teams—such as the New York Yankees and Mets, the Chicago Cubs and White Sox, and the Los Angeles Dodgers and Angels—in separate divisions, despite the broader geographic consolidation.

The Financial Thresholds and the Expansion Fee Mechanism

The capitalization required to enter the modern MLB landscape is staggering. The central mechanism of this entry is the expansion fee, which Commissioner Manfred has targeted at $2.2 billion per franchise. This fee does not function as operating capital for the new team; rather, it is a direct indemnification paid to the existing 30 ownership groups. It compensates them for the permanent dilution of central revenues—such as the multibillion-dollar national television contracts with FOX, TBS, and ESPN, as well as digital streaming revenues—that occurs when the league’s aggregate income is divided into 32 shares instead of 30.

When the $2.2 billion expansion fee is combined with the costs of constructing a modern, baseball-specific stadium (typically $1 billion to $1.8 billion) and establishing the operational reserves needed to field a competitive roster, the total capital commitment for a prospective ownership group approaches $4 billion. Consequently, the primary prerequisite for any candidate city is not merely municipal enthusiasm, but the mobilization of a heavily capitalized, diversified ownership syndicate capable of securing sophisticated public-private infrastructure financing.

The Competitive Landscape of Candidate Markets

The MLB expansion timeline indicates that a formal Request for Proposals (RFP) window will likely open in 2026, coinciding with the expiration of the current Collective Bargaining Agreement. Final franchise awards are anticipated by late 2027 or early 2028, with the inaugural seasons commencing in 2029. The resolution of the stadium crises in Las Vegas (with the Oakland Athletics’ impending relocation) and Tampa Bay (with the Rays’ stadium agreement) has cleared the final administrative hurdles preceding this formal expansion process.

Montreal faces an intensely competitive field of domestic markets. The evaluation of these markets rests on objective macroeconomic indicators, media market penetration, and the political viability of stadium infrastructure plans.

Expansion Candidate	2025 Metro Population	2023 Regional GDP ($B)	Primary Stadium Proposal / Development Hub	Ownership / Corporate Leadership
Austin, TX	2.31 Million	$232 Billion	Private riverfront ballpark requiring zero public tax increases	Austin Baseball Alliance
Nashville, TN	2.04 Million	$195 Billion	I-24 private stadium site adjacent to existing infrastructure	Music City Baseball
Salt Lake City, UT	1.23 Million	$148 Billion	“Big League Utah” Fairpark / Power District development	Larry H. Miller Co.
Portland, OR	2.27 Million	~$190 Billion	Waterfront Lloyd District development	Portland Diamond Project
Montreal, QC	4.34 Million	$205 Billion	Peel Basin urban ballpark with REM light rail integration	Stephen Bronfman group / Claridge
Orlando, FL	2.76 Million	~$180 Billion	$2 Billion mixed-use complex (asking for $975M tourist tax)	Orlando Dreamers

Market data aggregated from MLB Expansion Candidate Scorecards and regional economic reports.

While Montreal boasts the largest metropolitan population and a highly robust regional GDP, its bid is currently outpaced by the aggressive infrastructure maneuvering of its American counterparts. For example, Salt Lake City has advanced state legislation (HB562) that creates a framework for up to $900 million in state funds to support a $1.8 billion stadium project, representing a massive public-private commitment. Similarly, the Orlando bid claims to possess $2 billion in private capital while formally requesting $975 million in state tourist tax revenues. Conversely, Austin’s proposal centers on a fully privately financed riverfront stadium, providing MLB with a turnkey, politically insulated option.

To supersede these well-organized bids, the Montreal consortium must overcome the historical stigma of its previous franchise failure by presenting an infrastructure plan that fully mitigates public financial risk.

Forensic Anatomy of a Market Failure: The Montreal Expos (1969-2004)

Any assessment of Montreal’s future feasibility must be grounded in a rigorous diagnostic of its past. The Montreal Expos, established in 1969 as MLB’s first international franchise, operated until their relocation to Washington, D.C., in 2005. The narrative that Montreal is a fundamentally flawed baseball market oversimplifies the franchise’s demise, which resulted from a compounding sequence of catastrophic labour disputes, municipal infrastructure failures, and chronic ownership instability.

The Golden Era and the 1994 Labour Catastrophe

Initially playing at Jarry Park before moving to the cavernous Olympic Stadium in 1977, the Expos achieved significant success under original owners Seagram heir Charles Bronfman and financier Jean-Louis Lévesque. The team peaked in 1981, capturing the National League East division title. Led by star pitcher Steve Rogers, the Expos defeated the Philadelphia Phillies before ultimately falling to the Los Angeles Dodgers in a tightly contested National League Championship Series. During this era, attendance was exceptionally strong, routinely surpassing two million fans annually and exceeding the National League average.

Season	Stadium Facility	Average Attendance	Total Home Attendance	NL Average Attendance
1979	Olympic Stadium	26,023	2,102,267	2,058,930
1982	Olympic Stadium	28,629	2,318,961	2,057,755
1983	Olympic Stadium	28,737	2,320,651	2,060,942
1994	Olympic Stadium	24,543	1,180,332 (Shortened Season)	2,130,123 (Projected)
2001	Olympic Stadium	7,935	642,743	2,481,346

Historical attendance data illustrating the precipitous decline following the 1994 strike.

The franchise’s true inflection point came in 1994. Operating with one of the lowest payrolls in baseball under Felipe Alou, the Expos assembled a historic roster featuring future Hall of Famers like Pedro Martinez and stars such as Moises Alou and Ken Hill. By August 11, 1994, the Expos possessed a 74-40 record, the best in the major leagues. However, on that date, the MLBPA initiated a strike that cancelled the remainder of the season and the World Series.

The labour stoppage irreparably shattered the bond between the franchise and its fan base. Financially devastated by the loss of late-season revenue and the absence of a localized television contract, the ownership group executed a dramatic “fire sale” of their premier talent. The team finished last the following year, and attendance plummeted and never recovered.

The Labatt Park Debacle and Infrastructure Failure

The Expos’ decline was exacerbated by the physical deterioration of their home venue. The Olympic Stadium, constructed for the 1976 Summer Olympics, was deeply flawed as a baseball facility. Located in the city’s east end, far from the central business district, it suppressed weekday corporate attendance. More critically, the facility suffered from severe structural defects, including a notoriously unreliable retractable roof that frequently tore, forcing the team to play home games on the road.

By the late 1990s, a new ownership consortium led by Claude Brochu recognized that the franchise’s survival depended entirely on securing a modern, downtown, baseball-specific stadium. In 1997, the group proposed “Labatt Park,” a 35,000-seat retro-classic facility modelled after Baltimore’s Camden Yards, to be built in downtown Montreal at a projected cost of $250 million CAD.

The financing model required $150 million in provincial funding. However, Quebec Premier Lucien Bouchard categorically refused to provide public subsidies. The provincial government was still servicing the massive debt from the Olympic Stadium—colloquially known as the “Big Owe,” which ultimately cost taxpayers nearly $1 billion—and Bouchard argued it could not justify funding a private sports stadium while implementing austerity measures and closing hospitals.

Corporate Sabotage and Relocation

Without the prospect of a new stadium, the local ownership group fractured. Minority partners refused to inject further capital, leading to the sale of the franchise to art dealer Jeffrey Loria. Sports economists widely view Loria’s tenure as a period of corporate sabotage. He actively alienated the fan base, refused to negotiate in good faith for stadium funding, and notoriously tore up the Expos’ existing television and radio broadcast contracts as a negotiation tactic, effectively blacking out the team in its own market.

In a complex transaction brokered by MLB, Loria sold the defunct Expos franchise directly to the league for $120 million, utilizing the funds to purchase the Florida Marlins (where he successfully secured public financing for a new stadium). MLB operated the Expos as a ward of the league, forcing the team to play 22 “home” games a year at Hiram Bithorn Stadium in San Juan, Puerto Rico, in 2003 and 2004 to generate alternative revenue, before ultimately relocating the franchise to Washington, D.C.

The Modern Revival Movement (2012-Present)

Grassroots Mobilization: Warren Cromartie and ExposNation

The movement to resurrect Major League Baseball in Montreal originated not in corporate boardrooms, but through grassroots mobilization. In 2012, Warren Cromartie, a beloved former Expos outfielder who played for the team from 1974 to 1983 before finishing his career in Japan, launched the “Montreal Baseball Project” (MBP). Cromartie’s central thesis was that the macroeconomic conditions that doomed the Expos in 2004 had fundamentally reversed.

To provide empirical validation, the MBP partnered with the Board of Trade of Metropolitan Montreal and the financial firm Ernst & Young to commission a $400,000 feasibility study. The study concluded that modern Montreal possessed the requisite corporate density, wealth, and population scale to support a franchise, provided a downtown stadium could be constructed.

At the same time, a fan-driven non-profit organization known as ExposNation galvanized public sentiment. With a following of over 169,000 members, ExposNation showed the baseball industry that a multi-generational fan base remained dormant but highly engaged. This localized enthusiasm culminated in a series of highly successful MLB exhibition games. Between 2014 and 2019, the Toronto Blue Jays hosted annual preseason series at the Olympic Stadium. The inaugural 2014 series against the New York Mets drew over 96,000 fans across two games, a feat replicated in 2015 against the Cincinnati Reds, providing undeniable proof of concept to MLB’s central office.

The Corporate Shift: Stephen Bronfman and the Claridge Group

The grassroots momentum successfully attracted the necessary institutional capital when Stephen Bronfman assumed leadership of the revival efforts. Bronfman’s involvement—as the son of the Expos’ original majority owner, Charles Bronfman—gave the initiative deep financial resources and vital political connections through his investment firm, Claridge.

The Bronfman consortium initially pursued a highly unconventional strategy: a split-season arrangement with the Tampa Bay Rays. Announced in 2019, this plan proposed that the Rays would split their 81-game home schedule equally between a new stadium in Florida and a new stadium in Montreal. This arrangement was designed to circumvent the punitive lease tying the Rays to Tropicana Field until 2027 while instantly providing Montreal with a competitive, turnkey roster.

However, the proposal faced immense logistical hurdles. The MLBPA raised serious concerns about dual-city taxation, player housing, and the physical toll of playing an entire season on the road. Ultimately, MLB’s Executive Council formally rejected the split-season concept, forcing the Bronfman group to pivot its strategy entirely toward securing a permanent, full-time expansion franchise in the upcoming 2026-2027 bidding window.

The Peel Basin Project and Urban Development Mechanics

The absolute prerequisite for Montreal’s expansion bid is building world-class stadium infrastructure. Recognizing the fatal flaws of the Olympic Stadium and the failed Labatt Park proposal, the Bronfman group, in partnership with the major real estate developer Devimco, has targeted the Peel Basin. Located in the historic Lachine Canal area south of downtown Montreal, near the Griffintown and Pointe-Saint-Charles neighbourhoods, the Peel Basin is one of the city’s last major undeveloped tracts of urban land.

Infrastructure and Financial Engineering

The proposed Peel Basin stadium is designed to hold 29,000 to 35,000 spectators, with an estimated construction cost of $700 million to $1 billion CAD. This capacity conforms to modern MLB stadium economics, which prioritize smaller, more intimate venues to artificially restrict ticket supply, drive demand for highly profitable luxury suites, and eliminate the perception of empty seats that plagued the 60,000-seat Olympic Stadium.

To mitigate Montreal’s harsh climate without the prohibitive cost and aesthetic sterility of a retractable dome, the proposal features an open-air, environmentally sustainable design that uses geothermal energy and heated concourse floors to keep fans comfortable during the cooler spring and autumn months.

A critical component of this project is its integration with the Réseau express métropolitain (REM), Montreal’s automated light rail network. The transit-oriented development model eliminates the need for massive, environmentally degrading surface parking lots. Following intense lobbying by the Bronfman group in 2019 and 2020, the proposed REM station in the area was relocated and named Griffintown–Bernard-Landry to better serve the Peel Basin site, providing direct connectivity to the corporate centers of downtown Montreal and the wider metropolitan suburbs.

Socio-Political Friction and the Public Funding Paradox

Despite the sophisticated urban planning, the Peel Basin project faces entrenched socio-political resistance that threatens to derail the timeline necessary to appease Major League Baseball.

Community Opposition and the Gentrification Battle

The adjacent neighbourhood of Pointe-Saint-Charles has a deeply documented history of militant civic activism and resistance to corporate mega-projects. In the mid-2000s, community organizers successfully fought off a proposal by Loto-Québec to relocate the massive Montreal Casino to the Peel Basin, arguing it would bring deleterious social impacts.

Action-Gardien, a highly organized coalition of community groups advocating for the rights of low-income residents, spearheads the primary opposition to the baseball stadium. Action-Gardien has forcefully argued that the public land in the Peel Basin—owned by various federal and provincial entities, including the Canada Lands Company—should be utilized to construct up to 1,000 units of social and affordable housing, rather than a subsidized playground for professional sports. They contend that a stadium will aggressively accelerate the gentrification already sweeping through Griffintown, permanently pricing legacy residents out of the community.

To navigate this hostility, Devimco and the Bronfman group are attempting to revise their master plans to include mixed-use developments that blend high-density commercial office space (targeting green technology firms) with mandated quotas for social housing alongside the stadium footprint. Mayor Valérie Plante and the municipal government remain heavily involved in dictating a global vision for the Bridge-Bonaventure sector, insisting that any stadium development must demonstrably benefit the local community.

The Political Paradox: The Olympic Stadium Roof

The most severe threat to the Peel Basin’s public funding model is an unrelated infrastructure decision made by the provincial government. In February 2024, Premier François Legault announced that the Quebec government would spend an astounding $870 million to replace the roof of the functionally obsolete Olympic Stadium.

This decision creates a profound political paradox for the MLB expansion bid. The Bronfman group requires a sophisticated public-private partnership—likely in the form of tax increment financing (TIF) or favourable long-term provincial loans—to make the $700 million+ Peel Basin stadium economically viable. However, by sinking nearly a billion dollars into the Olympic Stadium, the Legault administration has effectively exhausted the public’s tolerance for sports-related infrastructure spending.

The optics of allocating provincial funds or land concessions to help a billionaire ownership group build a new baseball stadium, immediately after committing $870 million to repair a 50-year-old concrete monolith, are politically toxic. Consequently, the Bronfman consortium must engineer a financing model that relies almost exclusively on private equity and hyper-localized real estate development revenues, akin to the entirely private models proposed in Austin.

Cross-Border Sports Economics: Currency, Taxes, and Revenue Sharing

Beyond the localized challenges of stadium construction, a Montreal MLB franchise must navigate highly complex international macroeconomics. The structural flaw that crippled the Expos in their final decade—and remains a significant risk today—is the currency mismatch inherent in operating a Canadian franchise in a US-centric league.

The CAD/USD Currency Mismatch

Professional sports teams operating in Canada earn the overwhelming majority of their local revenues—such as ticket sales, local sponsorships, concessions, and regional broadcasting rights—in Canadian Dollars (CAD). However, as mandated by the collective bargaining agreements of all major North American sports leagues, player salaries and central league obligations must be paid in United States Dollars (USD).

This structural imbalance exposes Canadian franchises to severe foreign exchange rate risk. During the late 1990s and early 2000s, the Canadian dollar fell to historic lows, at one point hovering around $0.62 USD. This meant the Expos were paying a massive premium on their payroll simply because of the Canadian dollar’s macroeconomic weakness. If a future Montreal franchise operates with a modern $150 million USD payroll, a mere 10-cent drop in the CAD/USD exchange rate could instantaneously add tens of millions of dollars in unanticipated operational costs, severely damaging the team’s profitability.

Furthermore, Canada’s significantly higher marginal personal income tax rates create a competitive disadvantage when trying to lure elite free agents, as players are taxed based on the jurisdiction where the games are played. To compensate for the tax burden, Canadian teams often have to pay a financial premium on player contracts.

Revenue Sharing as an Economic Hedge

While exchange rate risk remains, Major League Baseball’s economic architecture has evolved significantly since 2004, offering robust protections for a prospective Montreal franchise. Academic research published in the Journal of Sports Economics (Rockerbie & Easton) has demonstrated that modern league-wide revenue sharing acts as a highly effective financial hedge against exchange rate volatility for Canadian teams.

Under the current MLB Collective Bargaining Agreement, teams contribute a significant percentage of their local revenues into a central pool, which is then divided equally among the clubs. More importantly, national television contracts (with FOX, ESPN, TBS, and Apple TV) and digital streaming revenues (MLB.tv) have skyrocketed. By 2021, each MLB club received roughly $50 million annually from national TV distributions, a figure that continues to rise.

Because these central distributions are paid to the clubs in USD, they act as a natural, unhedged offset to the team’s USD-denominated payroll obligations. As the proportion of a team’s total revenue derived from central USD distributions increases, the club’s exposure to CAD fluctuations decreases proportionately. Therefore, a modern Montreal franchise would be structurally insulated from currency shocks in a way the Expos never were.

Labour Relations and the 2026 Collective Bargaining Agreement

The current MLB Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) expires in December 2026, aligning perfectly with the anticipated RFP window for expansion. MLB remains the only major North American sports league without a hard salary cap, relying instead on a Competitive Balance Tax (CBT) to penalize excessive spending.

Commissioner Manfred and several owners have renewed calls for a hard salary cap to control rising payrolls, a proposal that the MLBPA vehemently opposes, viewing it as an artificial restriction on labour rights. The threat of a labour stoppage like the 1994 strike is a major risk factor for prospective expansion groups. A stable, highly regulated CBA that protects revenue sharing is the absolute prerequisite for the Bronfman group to secure the billions in private equity required to launch the franchise.

Canadian Media Rights and the Francophone Broadcast War

The final, and perhaps most lucrative, economic pillar determining Montreal’s viability is the restructuring of Canadian media rights. While the regional sports network (RSN) model is currently undergoing massive disruption and bankruptcy proceedings in the United States, the Canadian broadcast landscape remains dominated by deeply entrenched corporate oligopolies.

The Rogers Monopoly and the Toronto Blue Jays

Since the Expos’ departure, the Toronto Blue Jays have claimed all of Canada as their exclusive broadcast blackout territory, sharing only specific western provinces like British Columbia and Alberta with the Seattle Mariners. Rogers Communications, a massive telecommunications conglomerate, wholly owns the Blue Jays and also owns the Sportsnet television network. Sportsnet serves as the exclusive English-language home for the Blue Jays nationwide, resulting in a highly lucrative, vertically integrated media ecosystem that streams exclusively on Sportsnet+.

Introducing a Montreal franchise would immediately fracture this monopoly. Historically, when both teams existed, the Expos held exclusive rights in Quebec, while sharing Atlantic Canada and the non-Ontario western provinces with the Blue Jays. A new Montreal team would undoubtedly demand the reinstatement of exclusive territorial rights over Quebec and the Maritimes, directly cannibalizing Rogers’ national viewership metrics and subscription revenues.

Media Conglomerate	Network	Current MLB Asset	Primary Broadcast Territory
Rogers Communications	Sportsnet	Toronto Blue Jays	Pan-Canadian (Exclusive English)
Quebecor	TVA Sports	Blue Jays (Select French)	Quebec / Francophone Canada
Bell Media	RDS	MLB (National Package)	Quebec / Francophone Canada

Current Canadian MLB broadcasting rights distribution.

This creates a paradoxical dynamic within MLB ownership. Rogers Communications, as the owner of the Blue Jays, could serve as a significant internal impediment to Montreal’s bid to protect its national media monopoly. Conversely, a revived geographic rivalry could exponentially increase national interest, and MLB central leadership may view breaking the Canadian monopoly as necessary to maximize total North American revenue.

The Francophone Broadcasting War: RDS vs. TVA Sports

Within Quebec, media rights for a new MLB franchise would trigger a massive bidding war between the two dominant francophone sports networks: RDS (owned by Bell Media) and TVA Sports (owned by Quebecor).

The animosity between Bell and Quebecor is profound and highly litigious. In 2019, the two conglomerates engaged in a bitter dispute over carriage royalty fees, culminating in Quebecor illegally cutting the TVA Sports feed to Bell TV subscribers just minutes before the start of the NHL playoffs. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) had to intervene and issue directives forcing Quebecor to restore the signal.

For a Montreal MLB franchise, this corporate warfare is a major advantage. The team would gain a premier, tier-one sports asset offering 162 games of live programming during the critical summer months—when NHL hockey is dormant. RDS and TVA Sports both desperately need summer inventory to retain year-round subscriber revenues and prevent consumers from cutting the cord in favour of IPTV or streaming platforms. RDS currently airs a limited package of MLB, NBA, and NFL games, but is perceived to lack a singular, driving summer anchor.

A bidding war between Bell and Quebecor for the exclusive French-language regional rights to the new Montreal franchise would yield a massive, long-term broadcasting contract. This localized, CAD-denominated revenue stream would be vital in servicing the debt incurred to pay the $2.2 billion expansion fee and the construction costs of the Peel Basin stadium.

Strategic Synthesis and Final Feasibility Assessment

The possibility of Major League Baseball returning to Montreal sits at the intersection of international macroeconomics, urban real estate development, and corporate media strategy.

From an objective market perspective, Montreal’s fundamentals are undeniably robust. Its metropolitan population of 4.34 million and regional GDP of $205 billion dwarf several current expansion candidates, including Salt Lake City, Portland, and Nashville. Furthermore, the evolution of MLB’s collective bargaining agreement—specifically the enhancement of USD-denominated revenue sharing and centralized media distributions—provides a powerful macroeconomic hedge that protects Canadian teams from the currency-exchange fluctuations that doomed the Expos in the late 1990s. The guaranteed broadcasting bidding war between Bell (RDS) and Quebecor (TVA Sports) ensures a lucrative local revenue floor.

However, the obstacles remaining are severe, structural, and heavily politicized. MLB expansion in the modern era requires turnkey municipal infrastructure. While candidates like Salt Lake City have rapidly organized legislative frameworks for $900 million in public backing, Montreal is bogged down in socio-political inertia. The Legault administration’s politically costly decision to spend $870 million on repairing the obsolete Olympic Stadium roof severely damages the political appetite to provide the vital public-private financing required for the $700 million+ Peel Basin stadium project. Furthermore, the organized resistance from community groups like Action-Gardien against gentrification in Pointe-Saint-Charles threatens to delay zoning and environmental approvals well past MLB’s 2026-2027 decision window.

Ultimately, the viability of the Montreal bid rests entirely on the Bronfman consortium’s ability to privately finance the Peel Basin infrastructure without relying on overt provincial subsidies. If the ownership group can engineer a sustainable, privately backed real-estate development model that integrates seamlessly with the REM light rail and appeases local affordable housing demands, Montreal is uniquely positioned to reclaim its MLB franchise. If they cannot secure this infrastructure rapidly and privately, Major League Baseball will bypass Quebec in favour of the hyper-capitalized, politically unified bids emerging from the American West and South.

Other works related to MLB return to Montreal

• https://scortonboy17.ca/2026/03/26/reviving-the-montreal-expos-economic-opportunities-ahead/
• https://scortonboy17.ca/2025/02/27/could-montreal-be-home-to-an-mlb-team-again/

Works cited

1. MLB Expansion: 2025 Everything-Guide – The Austin Baseball Commission, https://www.atxmlb.com/mlb-expansion-updates/mlb-expansion-2025-deep-dive
2. MLB Expansion Plans: Possible Cities & Teams | DIRECTV Insider, https://www.directv.com/insider/mlb-expansion/
3. MLB commissioner Manfred hints at future expansion, realignment – theScore, https://www.thescore.com/mlb/news/3326969
4. Rob Manfred: MLB expansion ‘opens up a whole lot of opportunities’ – Awful Announcing, https://awfulannouncing.com/mlb/rob-manfred-mlb-expansion-opens-up-a-whole-lot-of-opportunities.html
5. Yankees and Mets in the same division? How Rob Manfred envisions MLB realignment post-expansion – CBS Sports, https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/mlb-realignment-expansion-east-west-manfred/
6. Reviving the Montreal Expos: Economic Opportunities Ahead – ScortonBoy17.ca, https://scortonboy17.ca/2026/03/26/reviving-the-montreal-expos-economic-opportunities-ahead/
7. MLB – Page 847 – Fox News, https://www.foxnews.com/category/sports/mlb?_gl=1*14qvfw6*_ga*U0JIZUgzenphbnlHOURWYUQyVnUwMlIxU1B4dGRhNGxwcjd4YnQ0M0kzbWJTams3Uk0ta2kzZTRleWI5V21jUg..*_ga_RH94J2NTVM*MTc2Nzk4NTQyMC4xLjEuMTc2Nzk4NTQyMy4wLjAuMA..&page=847
8. More Blog Posts | The Mighty 790 KFGO | KFGO, https://kfgo.com/more-blog/?sort=publish_date&categories=2431-1170,2431-5&offset=8135&items_per_page=10&items_per_more_page=10&el_class&length_of_article_summary=125&display_author_name=no&display_view=no&display_date=yes&layout=0&column_width=0&promo_position=default&target&back_url=/news/&back_page_name=News
9. What Would It Take For Major League Baseball To Return To Montreal? – Arizona Daily Independent, https://arizonadailyindependent.com/2025/08/14/what-would-it-take-for-major-league-baseball-to-return-to-montreal/
10. Montréal Expos – BR Bullpen – Baseball-Reference.com, https://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/Montr%C3%A9al_Expos
11. Montreal Expos – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreal_Expos
12. How do the Blue Jays pay their players? : r/baseball – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/baseball/comments/1whatb/how_do_the_blue_jays_pay_their_players/
13. Why did Expos leave Montreal? – Quora, https://www.quora.com/Why-did-Expos-leave-Montreal
14. Redéveloppement de Bridge-Bonaventure – Projet global – Urbanisme – Agora Montréal, https://forum.agoramtl.com/t/redeveloppement-de-bridge-bonaventure-projet-global/3324
15. Google Sports Data, https://support.google.com/knowledgepanel/answer/9787176
16. Rob Manfred Hints at MLB Realignment if it Undergoes Expansion – FOX Sports, https://www.foxsports.com/stories/mlb/rob-manfred-hints-realignment-might-take-place-mlb-undergoes-expansion
17. Manfred: MLB Has Talked Expansion, In-Season Tournament, Split Season – FOX Sports, https://www.foxsports.com/stories/mlb/manfred-mlb-has-talked-expansion-in-season-tournament-split-season
18. Major League Baseball blackout policy – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball_blackout_policy
19. Revenue Sharing in Professional Sports Leagues as a Hedge for Exchange Rate Risk, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320809721_Revenue_Sharing_in_Professional_Sports_Leagues_as_a_Hedge_for_Exchange_Rate_Risk
20. Revenue Sharing in Professional Sports Leagues as a Hedge for Exchange Rate Risk, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305281579_Revenue_Sharing_in_Professional_Sports_Leagues_as_a_Hedge_for_Exchange_Rate_Risk
21. Cleveland Guardians – Field of Schemes, https://www.fieldofschemes.com/category/mlb/cleveland-indians/
22. Utah approves $900M for MLB stadium, Salt Lake expansion – YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mo3oEm_dCCc
23. Expansion of Major League Baseball – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_Major_League_Baseball
24. MLB bill begins to round the bases on Utah’s Capitol Hill – YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQjQaLUpxuw
25. The Toronto Blue Jays Could Be Facing Yet Another Challenge For Payroll | MLB Reports, https://mlbreports.com/2014/02/03/cdndollar/
26. Montreal Expos team ownership history – Society for American Baseball Research, https://sabr.org/bioproj/topic/montreal-expos-team-ownership-history/
27. Cromartie heads group studying viability of MLB returning to Montreal | CBC Sports, https://www.cbc.ca/sports/baseball/mlb/cromartie-heads-group-studying-viability-of-mlb-returning-to-montreal-1.1357142
28. Montreal Expos attendance per year – ExposNation, https://exposnation.com/en/montreal-expos-attendance-per-year/
29. Assistance par Année des Expos de Montréal – ExposNation, https://exposnation.com/assistance-par-annee-des-expos-de-montreal/
30. List of Major League Baseball attendance records – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Major_League_Baseball_attendance_records
31. Olympic Stadium (Montreal) – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympic_Stadium_(Montreal)
32. The Ballparks That Never Were, https://ballparkdigest.com/2016/06/23/the-ballparks-that-never-were/
33. The proposed design of the Expos Labatt Park in downtown Montreal. : r/baseball – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/baseball/comments/10eunci/the_proposed_design_of_the_expos_labatt_park_in/
34. Montreal Expos | The Canadian Encyclopedia, https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/montreal-expos
35. Why did the Blue Jays survive when the Expos didn’t? : r/baseball – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/baseball/comments/14o1it1/why_did_the_blue_jays_survive_when_the_expos_didnt/
36. ExposNation joins forces with Warren Cromartie, https://exposnation.com/en/exposnation-joins-forces-with-warren-cromartie/
37. Warren Cromartie – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Cromartie
38. Warren Cromartie – Society for American Baseball Research – SABR.org, https://sabr.org/bioproj/person/warren-cromartie/
39. warren cromartie Archives – Ballpark Digest, https://ballparkdigest.com/warren-cromartie/
40. About Us – ExposNation, https://exposnation.com/en/about-us/
41. Stephen Bronfman – BR Bullpen – Baseball-Reference.com, https://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/Stephen_Bronfman
42. Potential MLB Expansion? The Case For 9 Cities in 3 Countries – FOX Sports, https://www.foxsports.com/stories/mlb/potential-mlb-expansion-cities-the-case-for-9-cities-in-3-countries
43. Nos Amours: The Saga of the Montreal Expos Review — A Swing and a Miss, https://povmagazine.com/nos-amours-the-saga-of-the-montreal-expos-review-nous-nous-souvons/
44. Baseball investors want to build stadium in Peel Basin – CTV News, https://www.ctvnews.ca/montreal/article/baseball-investors-want-to-build-stadium-in-peel-basin/
45. Griffintown–Bernard-Landry station – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griffintown%E2%80%93Bernard-Landry_station
46. Les médias et la santé : de l’émergence à l’appropriation des normes sociales, https://extranet.puq.ca/media/produits/documents/1791_9782760524248.pdf
47. Les médias et la santé : de l’émergence à l’appropriation des normes sociales – Archipel UQAM, https://archipel.uqam.ca/7658/1/Medias_sante_normes_soc_GRMS_2010.compressed.pdf
48. Developing Research-Creation in Community Through Landscape Painting and Pedagogy in Montréal, https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/994379/1/LeRue_PhD_F2024.pdf
49. Moshe Lander – Concordia University, https://www.concordia.ca/faculty/moshe-lander.html
50. How have MLB’s only Canadian team, the Toronto Blue Jays, been able to field a competitive side? : r/baseball – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/baseball/comments/1kjamxv/how_have_mlbs_only_canadian_team_the_toronto_blue/
51. Duane ROCKERBIE | Professor (Full) | PhD (Simon Fraser University) – ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Duane-Rockerbie
52. Winning and Other Determinants of Revenue in North America’s Major Professional Sports Leagues, https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5022&context=facpubs
53. Duane Rockerbie | IDEAS/RePEc, https://ideas.repec.org/e/pro81.html
54. EXPLORING AN MLB SALARY FLOOR 1 Exploring the Possibility of a Salary Floor in Major League Baseball (MLB) – Scholars Crossing, https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2448&context=masters
55. Revenue Sharing and Collusive Behavior in the Major League Baseball Posting System, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/8/3/71
56. Reinvestment Not Restriction: Modernizing MLB’s Economic Framework Without a Salary-Cap – eRepository @ Seton Hall, https://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2741&context=student_scholarship
57. Salary cap – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salary_cap
58. Expansion/Stadium Notes: Vancouver, Sacramento, Tampa – MLB Trade Rumors, https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2026/05/expansion-stadium-notes-vancouver-sacramento-tampa.html
59. Major League Baseball on regional sports networks – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball_on_regional_sports_networks
60. MLB.TV Blacking out Canada from Live Blue Jays Games : r/baseball – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/baseball/comments/f7dnq8/mlbtv_blacking_out_canada_from_live_blue_jays/
61. Watch Toronto Blue Jays: TV Schedule and Streaming Info – Cable TV, https://www.cabletv.com/mlb/watch-toronto-blue-jays
62. How can I watch games that have been blacked out by MLB Extra Innings? – Bell Support, https://support.bell.ca/fibe_tv/channels/what_is_mlb_extra_innings?step=3
63. Sportsnet on Prime Video – Sportsnet+ | Support, https://support.sportsnetplus.ca/hc/en-gb/articles/46382504106132-Sportsnet-on-Prime-Video
64. Frequently Asked Questions – Sportsnet, https://www.sportsnet.ca/more/frequently-asked-questions/
65. Tired Rant: Blackouts are dumb but even worse if a province doesn’t have a local team. Whoever drew up this map should lose Canadian citizenship. : r/hockey – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/hockey/comments/1n6npcc/tired_rant_blackouts_are_dumb_but_even_worse_if_a/
66. Quebecor proposes a truce in battle with Bell over TVA Sports channel | CBC News, https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebecor-bell-signal-1.5093421
67. CRTC holds hearing into dispute between Quebecor and Bell over TVA Sports signal – Montreal | Globalnews.ca, https://globalnews.ca/news/5177899/crtc-holds-hearing-into-dispute-between-quebecor-and-bell-over-tva-sports-signal/
68. Bell says regulator intervenes as Quebecor threatens to cut access to TVA Sports in price dispute – Telecompaper, https://www.telecompaper.com/news/bell-says-regulator-intervenes-as-quebecor-threatens-to-cut-access-to-tva-sports-in-price-dispute–1288225
69. RDS loses more money than TVA Sports : r/Quebec – Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/Quebec/comments/1lvyzbr/rds_perd_plus_dargent_que_tva_sports/?tl=en
70. Cord-Cutting in Canada 2026: Why More Households Are Switching to IPTV – The Seeker Newsmagazine Cornwall – theseeker.ca, https://theseeker.ca/2026/05/cord-cutting-in-canada-2026-why-more-households-are-switching-to-iptv/